William Shakespeare s Romeo And Juliet - 1638 Words

William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet tells the tragic story of two â€Å"star-crossed lovers† whose deaths bring about peace between their families in the denouement of the play. To a great extent Romeo and Juliet portrays to the audience the need to control their emotions through the tragic events. However, not only the characters excessive emotions compromise their intentions, but it is the manner in which they respond to their emotions. Shakespeare conveys how the characters respond to their motions through the use of different characters and their misadventures which are ultimately driven by a strong emotional stance. The tragic events that take place ultimately occur due to the characters not being able to control their emotions, through†¦show more content†¦Shakespeare portrays how the tragic events rise because of the characters ill-consideration of the causes of their actions when their emotions take control over their reason. Shakespeare first explor es one’s actions leading to a tragedy when Romeo slays Tybalt. Shakespeare uses the contrast of natural and violent motions when Romeo slays Tybalt to show how he cannot control his emotions when he is violent, but shows how his emotions are expressed through the natural motion of the people around him in Verona, hatred drowns the values of love and peace in Verona. This is expressed through Shakespeare’s use of Mercutio as a symbol of the tragedy that can arise from hatred â€Å"a plague on both your houses† and signifies the disease and death imagery that is present every day in Verona. The cause of this loss is primarily the lack of one’s ability to control their emotions, thus their inability results in them lashing out in violence. Shakespeare’s use of Juliet when she takes the potion is significant as her ‘death’ is a tragedy to the people of Verona, this signifies people of Verona are caught up in a daydream of fantasy, and whe n they realize that they have lost something so important, they find it impossible to control their emotions. This is revealed through the mourning of all the Capulets and Paris but most significantly Lord Capulet, â€Å"O child! O child! My

Holden Caulfield Character Analysis - 1368 Words

In J. D. Salinger’s novel, The Catcher in the Rye, we are introduced to an intriguing character named Holden Caulfield. In this narrative, Holden summarizes what happens to him in the past, over a period of three days, starting from when he is in Pencey Prep, an expensive boarding school in Agerstown, Pennsylvania. During this time, Holden goes through many internal hardships and dilemmas, mainly focusing on his view of society and people around him, acting â€Å"phony†. This feeling could be explained by one of the existential themes: Authenticity. Authenticity is wanting you or someone else to live a life that is unique to one’s inner self, and as an individual, while not following and behaving like what society and other people believe.†¦show more content†¦It is clear that he is not happy about D.B making so much, especially from a source that Holden despises. â€Å"He just got a Jaguar. One of those little English jobs that can do around two hundre d miles an hour. It cost him damn near four thousand bucks. He’s got a lot of dough, now. He didn’t use to† (3). It is important to notice the word â€Å"use† being italicized. Holden implies he liked D.B much more when he wasn’t rich. Holden had respect for D.B in the past when he made creative short stories, but now he associates him with every other phony that Holden knows. What Holden does not understand however, is that it is common for someone to pursue in wealth, and money while sacrificing their old life. Zeelengerg, Breugelmans, and Van de Ven state, â€Å"Another viewpoint is that greed is inherent to human nature and that all people are greedy to some extent. Some argue that being greedy is vital for human welfare and that it is an important evolutionary motive that promotes self-preservation† (505). The three scholars claim that everyone is greedy as it is a part of human nature, and some debate that greed is important for happine ss and prosperity. Therefore, Holden has unrealistic expectations on his older brother D.B, for not wanting him to go to Hollywood and become a screenwriter. Furthermore, another example of a character that Holden believes is not true to himself is Ernie. When Holden arrives to Ernies nightclub in chapter 12, he says,†He had a big damn mirror inShow MoreRelatedCharacter Analysis of Holden Caulfield844 Words   |  4 PagesCharacter Analysis In the beginning of The Catcher in the Rye, we see one type of person in Holden Caulfield. By the end of the book, we see a whole new person. How is it that one person can change as much in a short time period? They change by the experiences they go through. Holden went through a lot of experiences in a short period of time especially, and also in his past history. In the beginning of the novel, Holden has just come back from a fencing game in New York. He has also been kickedRead MoreHolden Caulfield Character Analysis Essay1249 Words   |  5 Pages In â€Å"The Catcher in the Rye† by J.D. Salinger, the main character Holden Caulfield is a nervous and unhappy dropout. After being kicked out of his prestigious high school, he goes to New York City and roams the streets for three days searching for both innocence and adulthood. While he holds a hatred for â€Å"phonies†, people he sees as fakes or cheats, he himself can be portrayed as a phony. Holden admires certain qualities in a person. He likes people who are honest, intelligent and open. He alsoRead MoreHolden Caulfield Character Analysis721 Words   |  3 PagesHolden Caulfield is alone for the first time, forcing him to not only see the reality of everlasting corruption, but also show him he stands alone in wanting to preserve young innocence. Throughout the book Holden is always putting forth efforts to help everyone, further pushing him astray from societys normalities. While some may say that Holden is always distraught because of his own reckless behavior, I say Holden is trying to counter reckless behavior that is being forced upon the young peopleRead MoreHolden Caulfield Character Analysis1730 Words   |  7 PagesThe Catcher in the Rye, the protagonist, Holden Caulfield, undergoes an immense psychological change where he transforms from youth to maturity. The major conflict in the novel which held Holden back from progressing into adulthood had to do with the death of his younger brother, Allie. The way Holden expresses himself and all of the decisions he has made can all be related back to that experience which he has never been able to cope with. As a result, Holden spends the majority of his time alone whichRead MoreCharacter Analysis Of Holden Caulfield1110 Words   |  5 PagesIn the book, The Catcher in the Rye, the most character Holden Caulfield has strange behavioral personalities. It turns into a lot of and a lot of obvious that Holden, an extended method of being sensible, has clouded judgment as he rides an associate emotional roller coaster of mood ups and downs. in these strains, its straightforward that his wide selection of non-public flaws like his distrustful and suspicious of individuals, depressive, and unreasonable attitudes and thoughts come back fromRead MoreHolden Caulfield Character Analysis Essay895 Words   |  4 Pagesreally means something to us. In Catcher in the Rye, written by J.D. Salinger, Holden C aulfield is a 16 year old young man that has gone through some rough times. With a little brother, Allie, that died of cancer at the age of 11, A big brother, D.B., who became big writing childrens books so he left for hollywood soon after Allie’s death. Holden has been dropped out of three schools, and is currently attending Pency. Holden doesnt have much to be happy about in his life, not really much to live forRead MoreCharacter Analysis Of Holden Caulfield s The Catcher Of The Rye 1733 Words   |  7 PagesCatcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, Holden Caulfield is faced with multiple â€Å"phonies† that divert him from those he really holds affection for. Throughout the novel Holden shows disgust for certain characters but his ability to build relationships of intimacy are most eminent. Through Allie Caulfield, Holden is able to make a more personal connection. Seeing as how he is now dead, Allie is a savior in the eyes’ of Holden when he is in the time of n eed. Phoebe Caulfield, Holden’s ten year old sister, sharesRead MoreAnalysis Of Characters And Themes Of The Catcher Rye 1537 Words   |  7 Pages Analysis of Characters and Themes in The Catcher in the Rye J.D. Salinger was born in 1919 to a wealthy Manhattan family. He grew up in the same social conditions as Holden Caulfield does in The Catcher in the Rye. The last thing Salinger cared about was being a successful student because he was very lazy, without care for his responsibilities and tasks. Salinger flunked out of many prep schools, and his parents sent him to a military academy named Valley Forge in Pennsylvania, where he graduatedRead MoreCatcher in the Rye- Holden as a Dynamic Character Essay example660 Words   |  3 PagesAlexa Noelle Mrs. Mow American Studies 27 March 2012 Analysis of Holden Caulfield Throughout the novel The Catcher in the Rye Holden sees the world as an evil and corrupt place, however it is clear that he gradually comes to the conclusion he cannot change it. The first instance demonstrating Holden’s progression is when he sees the profanity written all over Phoebe’s school. In this moment he finally understands that it is inevitable to enter adulthood and realizes the impossibility to tryRead MoreAnalysis of JD Salingers The Catcher in the Rye1594 Words   |  6 PagesAnalysis of JD Salingers The Catcher in the Rye J. D. Salinger wanted to write a story, that many believe is at least partially autobiographical, about the angst of being a teen age boy trying to navigate the transition between adolescence and adulthood. The story has been a constant in lists about the best American novels written in the twentieth century, and it has received much criticism also. It is not that people do not believe that Caulfield would have cussed as much as he does or that

Clash of titans East vs. West Free Essays

Europe includes an immense diversity of cultures and languages that developed side by side; Asia on the other hand had been developing on its own for centuries before Europe began to evolve. So how did the â€Å"peninsula of Asia†, become not only a strong force in the West, but a global power. Through the different articles we read, Illustrated History of Europe, Roberts’ A History of Europe, Davies’ Europe: A History, Diamond’s Guns, Germs, and Steel, Landes’ The Wealth and Poverty of Nations, and Hanson’s Carnage and Culture one can understand how and why the later developing Europe became the dominate power over the already powerful Asia. We will write a custom essay sample on Clash of titans: East vs. West or any similar topic only for you Order Now The Illustrated History of Europe calls Europe a divided continent, but one civilization. Europe’s wide plains, for example the Great Northern Plain, only aid to an easy invasion from the east which happened numerous times throughout Europe’s history. Europe also has a high diversity of languages, 43 in total, that were originated from Sanskrit. Because of this, Europe’s language, in written from, is based on a consonantal system rather than that of an ideographic system such as the Chinese use. This article broke down Europe’s civilization into three different bases: democracy originating from the Greeks, law coming from the Romans, and finally, the value of individualism and liberty derived from the Christians. Roberts and Davies mainly describe Europe’s geography and how it affected the development of the people within. Roberts described Europe as a â€Å"peninsula of Asia†, being surrounded on its boundaries, primarily by water. This was why Europe was able to develop on its own. The bodies of water, plus the plains and heavily forested inner regions, caused people to become very isolated from one another thus letting them make their own decisions and also forming their own languages. Western Europe’s temperate climate aided by the Gulf Stream kept its environment mild year round, plus with the addition of a good amount of rain made it easy to farm without irrigation. Central and Eastern Europe were not as lucky, however, because they experienced fluctuations in temperature and rainfall. Diamond discussed how the â€Å"creation† of the farmer through the domestication of plants and animals led to the development of guns, germs, and steel. He compared the â€Å"hunter/gather† peoples with the â€Å"food producing† peoples, to demonstrate the benefit of the farmer. With a farming group, one could devote one’s time to other jobs, and thus become â€Å"specialists†. These specialists could master an art or trade instead of spending time searching for food, and eventually evolved to become the kings, bureaucrats, soldiers, priests, and artisans. The domestications of plants and animals was an integral part of the development of the farming culture over that of the hunting culture. For example, the peapod when it is ripe will â€Å"explode† and drop its seeds onto the ground. The only thing left on the plant after this occurs are the pea pods that did not explode. Thus those were the ones which we were able to eat because they were the only ones we were able to gather. We would therefore only disperse the seeds of the â€Å"non-exploding† pea pods through our excrement or our garbage dumps. In the end the hunter/gatherers will eventually die out because they do not have the steel to make tools as well as the weapons that the farmers have and thus will, in time, be destroyed. Latitude played a huge role in the rise of farmers in Europe. Due to the similar latitude throughout Europe the growing season is relatively the same, along with a relatively equal climate. The easy spread of germs came about because people lived in crowded villages where a disease could simply pass from one household to another. Plus with the domestication of animals, the animals now lived in close quarters to the people and thus contributed to the spread of diseases. When the European explorers introduced germs to the Native Americans, many Native Americas were killed because they didn’t have the built up resistance because of the lack of domesticated animals. Because of Europe’s close proximity to animals many of the world’s diseases have originated there. The Fertile Crescent was a very ecologically fragile area. It ended up being destroyed due to deforestation, and erosion, as well as other factors and now is mainly desert. The Great Man theory said that a few great men can influence the events of history. One of the main reasons Europe â€Å"outdid† China was because of Europe was fragmented, whereas China was totally united, this basically meant that competition could flourish while in China what was said was unquestioned. Landes covered some of what was in the Roberts article as well as what was in the Davies article. He discussed the Gulf Stream and the immense forests, but he also pointed out facts about riverside civilizations. People gathered around rivers because they not only provided water, but also a mode of transportation. Riverside civilizations, because of their strategic importance were, however, more likely to have a ruler. In riverside civilizations if the ruler needed money or more land then he would just take what they wanted from the people. As far as property goes in the West, where there was no need for riverside civilizations due to the temperate climate and abundant rainfall, there was a deep commitment to private property; so much so that even kings did not take their subjects property. During the period of 1000 – 1500 AD, five â€Å"great† inventions were made. These inventions were deemed the â€Å"inventions of inventions†. The inventions were the mechanical clock, gunpowder, eyeglasses, printing, and the water wheel. Gunpowder, in China was used as a defense, but in the European’s hands it became an offensive weapon. Eyeglasses â€Å"created† an additional work force from the many people who had poor eyesight but were in overall good physical condition. Printing was used to spread knowledge, so ideas no longer had to be passed by word of mouth. The water wheel became an addition source of power. The mechanical clock, in my opinion the most important, kept people task oriented, and because people always want the most accurate time we kept improving upon it and it turn improved upon all inventions. This was the economic revolution, which was only comparable to when humans went from hunter/gatherers to food producers. Hanson stated that the reason the West fought so well was because Europeans fought for their own land. Peoples in the West had a voice in what happened, militarily and politically, whereas peoples in the east had none. An example of this would be the battle of Salamis, the Greek soldiers got together only hours before the battle to decide if fighting this fight was really worth it. On the Persian side, however, the soldiers had no say in it, and fought that battle not necessarily wanting to fight for the cause. Due to the West’s freedom, private property, domestication of plants and animals and the movement from hunter/gatherers to food producers were all factors why the less developed Europe came to overpower the already strong Asia. If Asia had had a these â€Å"fundamentals† as did the West think how different the world would be. How to cite Clash of titans: East vs. West, Papers

Clash of titans East vs. West Free Essays

Europe includes an immense diversity of cultures and languages that developed side by side; Asia on the other hand had been developing on its own for centuries before Europe began to evolve. So how did the â€Å"peninsula of Asia†, become not only a strong force in the West, but a global power. Through the different articles we read, Illustrated History of Europe, Roberts’ A History of Europe, Davies’ Europe: A History, Diamond’s Guns, Germs, and Steel, Landes’ The Wealth and Poverty of Nations, and Hanson’s Carnage and Culture one can understand how and why the later developing Europe became the dominate power over the already powerful Asia. We will write a custom essay sample on Clash of titans: East vs. West or any similar topic only for you Order Now The Illustrated History of Europe calls Europe a divided continent, but one civilization. Europe’s wide plains, for example the Great Northern Plain, only aid to an easy invasion from the east which happened numerous times throughout Europe’s history. Europe also has a high diversity of languages, 43 in total, that were originated from Sanskrit. Because of this, Europe’s language, in written from, is based on a consonantal system rather than that of an ideographic system such as the Chinese use. This article broke down Europe’s civilization into three different bases: democracy originating from the Greeks, law coming from the Romans, and finally, the value of individualism and liberty derived from the Christians. Roberts and Davies mainly describe Europe’s geography and how it affected the development of the people within. Roberts described Europe as a â€Å"peninsula of Asia†, being surrounded on its boundaries, primarily by water. This was why Europe was able to develop on its own. The bodies of water, plus the plains and heavily forested inner regions, caused people to become very isolated from one another thus letting them make their own decisions and also forming their own languages. Western Europe’s temperate climate aided by the Gulf Stream kept its environment mild year round, plus with the addition of a good amount of rain made it easy to farm without irrigation. Central and Eastern Europe were not as lucky, however, because they experienced fluctuations in temperature and rainfall. Diamond discussed how the â€Å"creation† of the farmer through the domestication of plants and animals led to the development of guns, germs, and steel. He compared the â€Å"hunter/gather† peoples with the â€Å"food producing† peoples, to demonstrate the benefit of the farmer. With a farming group, one could devote one’s time to other jobs, and thus become â€Å"specialists†. These specialists could master an art or trade instead of spending time searching for food, and eventually evolved to become the kings, bureaucrats, soldiers, priests, and artisans. The domestications of plants and animals was an integral part of the development of the farming culture over that of the hunting culture. For example, the peapod when it is ripe will â€Å"explode† and drop its seeds onto the ground. The only thing left on the plant after this occurs are the pea pods that did not explode. Thus those were the ones which we were able to eat because they were the only ones we were able to gather. We would therefore only disperse the seeds of the â€Å"non-exploding† pea pods through our excrement or our garbage dumps. In the end the hunter/gatherers will eventually die out because they do not have the steel to make tools as well as the weapons that the farmers have and thus will, in time, be destroyed. Latitude played a huge role in the rise of farmers in Europe. Due to the similar latitude throughout Europe the growing season is relatively the same, along with a relatively equal climate. The easy spread of germs came about because people lived in crowded villages where a disease could simply pass from one household to another. Plus with the domestication of animals, the animals now lived in close quarters to the people and thus contributed to the spread of diseases. When the European explorers introduced germs to the Native Americans, many Native Americas were killed because they didn’t have the built up resistance because of the lack of domesticated animals. Because of Europe’s close proximity to animals many of the world’s diseases have originated there. The Fertile Crescent was a very ecologically fragile area. It ended up being destroyed due to deforestation, and erosion, as well as other factors and now is mainly desert. The Great Man theory said that a few great men can influence the events of history. One of the main reasons Europe â€Å"outdid† China was because of Europe was fragmented, whereas China was totally united, this basically meant that competition could flourish while in China what was said was unquestioned. Landes covered some of what was in the Roberts article as well as what was in the Davies article. He discussed the Gulf Stream and the immense forests, but he also pointed out facts about riverside civilizations. People gathered around rivers because they not only provided water, but also a mode of transportation. Riverside civilizations, because of their strategic importance were, however, more likely to have a ruler. In riverside civilizations if the ruler needed money or more land then he would just take what they wanted from the people. As far as property goes in the West, where there was no need for riverside civilizations due to the temperate climate and abundant rainfall, there was a deep commitment to private property; so much so that even kings did not take their subjects property. During the period of 1000 – 1500 AD, five â€Å"great† inventions were made. These inventions were deemed the â€Å"inventions of inventions†. The inventions were the mechanical clock, gunpowder, eyeglasses, printing, and the water wheel. Gunpowder, in China was used as a defense, but in the European’s hands it became an offensive weapon. Eyeglasses â€Å"created† an additional work force from the many people who had poor eyesight but were in overall good physical condition. Printing was used to spread knowledge, so ideas no longer had to be passed by word of mouth. The water wheel became an addition source of power. The mechanical clock, in my opinion the most important, kept people task oriented, and because people always want the most accurate time we kept improving upon it and it turn improved upon all inventions. This was the economic revolution, which was only comparable to when humans went from hunter/gatherers to food producers. Hanson stated that the reason the West fought so well was because Europeans fought for their own land. Peoples in the West had a voice in what happened, militarily and politically, whereas peoples in the east had none. An example of this would be the battle of Salamis, the Greek soldiers got together only hours before the battle to decide if fighting this fight was really worth it. On the Persian side, however, the soldiers had no say in it, and fought that battle not necessarily wanting to fight for the cause. Due to the West’s freedom, private property, domestication of plants and animals and the movement from hunter/gatherers to food producers were all factors why the less developed Europe came to overpower the already strong Asia. If Asia had had a these â€Å"fundamentals† as did the West think how different the world would be. How to cite Clash of titans: East vs. West, Papers