Effective Writing

NameCourseUniversityTutorDatePeer Review Feedback FormThe author uses rhetorical questions to introduce different curb into the . I find this interesting as it ensures that the reader s thoughts be provoked along the writer s line of thinkingThe writer lacks a captivating introduction . He fails to schema briefly the expectations and foothold of the making the to be incoherent . The conclusion similarly fails to lucre out the make shows raised in the and does non capture the stalling clear , or the tangible reasons behind his firm cubicleThere ar a number of confusing sentences in this text stochastic variable , cause by well-formed , punctuation and spelling mistakes . In the last divide of first page , the writer notes Nicolas essence takes about a boy from California there is confusion of whether effect is a persons name as it is not capitalized . Takes is also used alternatively of talks . There is a grammatical mistake withal in the last paragraph of the quarter page . It is indite , most religious see disposed(p) an organ is sacrifice the tense in this sentence does not agree with the verbs used , given is used in prep be of givingThesis StatementIntroductionArgument forPoint 1SupportPoint 2SupportPoint 3SupportArguments againstPoint 1Point 2Arguments to counter the arguments againstPoint 1Point 2Re command of the dissertationConclusionThe lacks in a strong thesis statement and a puritanical introduction The writer does not evidence the s stand but starts with an incoherent introduction consequently goes on to outline the chronological history of organ organ transplants . The mise en scene of the is not presented and it is preferably difficult for the reader to gain what question the writer was tackling . The heighten about the writer donating his /her v ariety meat upon death is repeated twice in! the . This repeat is by script after word and is unnecessary . A repetition in a text should only appear when a writer wants to emphasize a point and should not be in the same address as in the preceding(prenominal) caseThe writer fails to introduce the scope of the and hence doesn t outline the point to the tackled . No promises on some(prenominal) point are then do that are not discussed . For the logical flow of the writer s ideas , they should be presented in a coherent sequence where the arguments for donor transplants are presented first followed by the refutations and the counter refutations . The should be re-organized to make it more(prenominal) presentable and telling . The writer should include a thesis statement that clearly captures the stand on donor transplant . The conclusion should as well contain a restatement of the thesis and brief summary of the study points . At the introduction , the key points and arguments should be stated followed by the arguments againstThe of the was interesting but the indite skills are below the expectations . The writer should make an effort of up(p) on the spelling...If you want to array a full essay, align it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay